Malt Kiln Lane Speed Bumps
Harewood Parish Council and Harewood Estate have been presented with a petition requesting the removal of the three round top speed bumps on Malt Kiln Lane and their replacement with two cushioned bumps. The petition carried 105 signatures.
While the Parish Council appreciate that the speed bumps cause minor inconvenience to some drivers on the lane, our primary concern is pedestrian safety. Malt Kiln Lane is narrow with high hedging either side and carries a public footpath. Residents on the lane, their visitors and service providers have permissive rights of access for vehicles, as well as the local farmers, gas and telecommunications services. The Parish Council has vehicular access rights for disabled drivers and maintenance vehicles only. The lane is too narrow to provide a pavement to separate pedestrians from traffic.
We do not accept that the bumps are badly designed, unnecessarily severe or damaging to vehicles. They were installed within the standard specification for a 5mph limit and can be negotiated without damage provided 5mph is not exceeded. Nor are they an eyesore. Planning consent for the recreation area required the use of natural materials or to match existing. Malt Kiln Lane is surfaced with tarmac and the bumps are in keeping with the existing surface. Similar style and specification of speed bumps can be found on the access road to Leeds Grammar School.
Department of Transport guidance supports the need for three bumps to maintain safe speeds along the length of the lane from the A61 to the entrance to the recreation area and the proposed cushioned bumps (rubberised plastic) alternatives are neither environmentally friendly nor are they effective unless installed at 75mm (5 to 10mm higher than the existing bumps).
It is regrettable that a number of people find the bumps offensive but planning approval for the recreation area stipulated that the Parish Council had to demonstrate that safe access could be achieved, and speed bumps were the solution agreed with the planners. However, we recognise the concern caused to parishioners and will continue discussions to explore any viable alternatives. |